Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Once cesarean section--always cesarean section?].

Authors: J, Lembke; E, Breitenfeld; H, Wichmann; G, Göretzlehner;

[Once cesarean section--always cesarean section?].

Abstract

Between 1975 and 1985 from 522 patients, who had undergone caesarean section during their previous delivery or deliveries, per cent 63 have been delivered vaginally and 37 per cent with a caesarean section (52.8% primary, 47.2% secondary). The rate of spontaneous labour was higher, if patient had a spontaneous delivery before caesarean section or the first caesarean section has been performed because of a placenta praevia, a breech presentation or a fetal distress syndrome. Cephalopelvic disproportion went on in 67.2 per cent with a caesarean section. Rupture of the scare occurred in 2.9 per cent. Expectative management of delivery is justified following previous caesarean section. Oxytocin infusions are possible in cases if internal tocography will be done.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cardiotocography, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Extraction, Obstetrical, Female, Pelvimetry, Trial of Labor

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!