Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinician Perceptions of Implementing the Cultural Formulation Interview on a Mixed Forensic Unit.

Authors: Neil K, Aggarwal; Peter, Lam; Samantha, Diaz; Amanda G, Cruz; Roberto, Lewis-Fernández;

Clinician Perceptions of Implementing the Cultural Formulation Interview on a Mixed Forensic Unit.

Abstract

The use of the Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI), a 16-item, semistructured, patient cultural assessment, in a forensic mental health setting has not been examined. Using a mixed-methods approach, we performed a pilot test of the CFI in an inpatient service that treats both forensic and nonforensic adult patients. Clinicians' attitudes toward adoption of the CFI was assessed quantitatively with the Evidence-Based Practices Attitudes Scale, which is used to measure provider attitudes toward adopting new treatments, and qualitatively with a semistructured interview. Assessments occurred up to five times to analyze changes with increasing CFI use. In the quantitative measures we observed a general openness to implementing the CFI throughout the implementation period. Compared with clinicians on civil units, forensic clinicians indicated they were less likely to implement the CFI over time if it were required rather than voluntary. Interviews with clinicians revealed concerns about the skills, ability, and confidence needed to implement the CFI, external requirements, and the ease of integrating the CFI into their practice. Based on our findings, forensic units could encourage CFI use after the clinician has determined that the patient is clinically stable, rather than at admission. Units could also incorporate information obtained from the CFI into current documentation to reduce administrative burden.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Attitude of Health Personnel, Mental Disorders, New York, Pilot Projects, Forensic Psychiatry, Middle Aged, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Interview, Psychological, Humans, Female, Cultural Competency

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!