Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A randomized double blind trial of dialysate sodiums of 145 mEq/L, 150 mEq/L, and 155 mEq/L.

Authors: P E, Barré; G, Brunelle; M, Gascon-Barré;

A randomized double blind trial of dialysate sodiums of 145 mEq/L, 150 mEq/L, and 155 mEq/L.

Abstract

Most hemodialysis is now carried out with a dialysate sodium concentration of 140-145 mEq/L. Higher dialysate sodium has been used, but controversy exists concerning the increased incidence of high blood pressure (HBP), thirst, and weight gain. A double blind prospective study was carried out in five stable men on chronic hemodialysis. Dialysis was performed in random sequence with a dialysate sodium of 145, 150, or 155 mEq/L for 2 months at a time. Vital signs were monitored before, during, and after dialysis, and the presence of symptoms during and between dialyses was documented. There was a significant increase in interdialytic weight gain with increasing dialysate sodium: 145 mEq/L (2.2 kg), 150 mEq/L (2.6 kg), 155 mEq/L (2.9 kg). There was a small, nonsignificant increment in dry weight of 0.5 kg between a dialysate of 145 mEq/L to 155 mEq/L but no increase in the mean arterial blood pressure. There was no difference in the incidence of interdialytic or intradialytic symptoms, including cramps, nausea, or fatigue, nor any change in serum sodium or other routine laboratory data before dialysis. It is concluded that a high dialysate sodium is not associated with an increased incidence of hypertension, symptoms, or a change in serum sodium but is associated with an increase in interdialytic weight gain.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Body Weight, Sodium, Blood Pressure, Random Allocation, Double-Blind Method, Dialysis Solutions, Humans, Prospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    17
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
17
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!