Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement.

Authors: H U, Cameron; Y B, Jung;

A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement.

Abstract

The knees of 20 patients with a unicompartmental arthroplasty on one s ide and a total replacement on the other were compared at follow-ups of over two years. Length of hospitalization was slightly less with the unicompartmental knees and recovery was faster. By one year, however, there was essentially no difference between the unicompartmental knees and the total replacements in spite of the fact that the former had a better range of movement. This suggests that flexion beyond 105 degrees is not of great significance to elderly people living in the West. It also suggests that, as the posterior cruciate was resected or lengthened in the majority of the total knee replacements, the presence or absence of this ligament does not affect the activities of daily living. Complications both early and late were more frequent with a unicompartmental knee, possibly implicating inferior patient selection, instrumentation, and implant design.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Length of Stay, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Arthroplasty, Activities of Daily Living, Osteoarthritis, Humans, Female, Knee Prosthesis, Aged, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    32
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
32
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!