
This study is a quantitative and qualitative assessment of data from the Brazilian Information System on Live Births (SINASC) in Brazil. Coverage of the data by municipality was estimated as the ratio between reported and estimated live births. Data quality in the SINASC was assessed via probabilistic linkage with the database from the Birth in Brazil study, 2011-2012, and kappa coefficients of agreement were calculated. In 2013, data coverage was high and homogeneous in all states of Brazil. However, the analysis according to municipalities (counties) showed greater spatial heterogeneity. As for completeness of information in SINASC, kappa coefficients were statistically different from zero for all the tested variables (p < 0.001), and marginal distributions of all the variables were similar in the two databases. Gestational age was the variable with the worst agreement, with a kappa value of 0.461. The indicator that describes the inconsistencies, measured by the sum of the square of the differences between the reported and expected prematurity rates by birthweight bracket, showed the highest value in the North of Brazil and the lowest in the South, pointing to geographic inequalities in measurement of gestational age.
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Middle Aged, Data Accuracy, Young Adult, Residence Characteristics, Birth Certificates, Birth Weight, Educational Status, Humans, Female, Medical Record Linkage, Brazil, Infant, Premature, Information Systems
Adult, Male, Adolescent, Databases, Factual, Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Middle Aged, Data Accuracy, Young Adult, Residence Characteristics, Birth Certificates, Birth Weight, Educational Status, Humans, Female, Medical Record Linkage, Brazil, Infant, Premature, Information Systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
