Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Minimum Effective Dose (ED50 and ED95) of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.

Authors: Tito D, Tubog; Virginia Londahl, Ramsey; Laura, Filler; Richard S, Bramble;

Minimum Effective Dose (ED50 and ED95) of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review.

Abstract

Lowering the dose of the local anesthesia significantly reduces the risks of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in an elective cesarean delivery. Determination of the mean effective dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine will aid clinicians in managing maternal hypotension. The systematic search of studies evaluating the mean effective dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine yielded 10 clinical trials reporting the minimum effective dose in 50% (ED50) and 95% (ED95) of patients. The up-down method and the random allocation design were the dose-finding strategies used in all trials included in the review. The calculated ED50 and ED95 of bupivacaine varied according to different patient subgroups. The estimated ED50 of hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without opioid ranged from 4.7 mg to 9.8 mg. The calculated ED95 ranged from 8.8 mg to 15 mg. Doses at the level of ED50 minimized spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension yet increased intraoperative pain supplementation, whereas doses at the level of ED95 provided adequate surgical anesthesia with increased risk of maternal hypotension. Furthermore, the addition of intrathecal administration of opioids reduced local anesthetic doses. In the clinical setting, low-dose spinal anesthesia should be used only in combination with the combined spinal-epidural technique.

Keywords

Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Cesarean Section, Pregnancy, Anesthesia, Obstetrical, Humans, Female, Anesthetics, Local, Bupivacaine, Injections, Spinal, Nurse Anesthetists

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!