
pmid: 31580036
handle: 2066/208594
Transitions of care pose a risk to medication safety. To reduce patient harm, medication reconciliation is advised. However, implementation of medication reconciliation is difficult due to time constraints. We present two female patients aged 82 and 84 years. In both women, unintentional discrepancies arose, went undetected and led to patient harm. Accurate information transfer is essential for continuity of patient care. Medication reconciliation comprises four steps, i.e. verification (identify discrepancies), clarification (check the collected list), reconciliation (document the reason for medication changes) and transfer (communicate the updated list). This article discusses the steps of medication reconciliation and those medication errors that arise during a patient's transfer from the home setting to hospitalization or a clinic visit. We show that medication reconciliation is not merely an administrative task. As the patient is the only constant factor in health care, patient participation is essential.
Contains fulltext : 208594.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Aged, 80 and over, Patient Transfer, Pharmacology-Toxicology - Radboud University Medical Center, Hospitalization, Medication Reconciliation, Humans, Medication Errors, Female, Internal Medicine - Radboud University Medical Center, Patient Participation
Radboudumc 18: Healthcare improvement science RIHS: Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Aged, 80 and over, Patient Transfer, Pharmacology-Toxicology - Radboud University Medical Center, Hospitalization, Medication Reconciliation, Humans, Medication Errors, Female, Internal Medicine - Radboud University Medical Center, Patient Participation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
