
An increasing number of infections due to Elisabethkingia spp. have been observed and reported in recent years. Here we report the microbiological aspects of 13 cases with positive cultures for Elizabethkingia spp. from 1998 to 2017. Elizabethkingia isolates were identified using the Vitek 2 Compact 60 (AES software) Gram-Negative Identification test (GNI) card (bioMerieux. Marcy-l'Etoile, France). The MICs were determined using Vitek 2 and interpreted according to CLSI guidelines based on the interpretive MIC breakpoints for Acinetobacter spp. Vitek 2 susceptibility results were confirmed using the manual E-test and the colistin result was confirmed using the broth dilution method. Twelve cases were observed between 2010 and 2017 with four cases in 2017. Of the 2017 samples, three out of four isolates were obtained outside the intensive care units compared to one out of eight samples between 2010 and 2016. There was variable susceptibility to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (58.3%), ciprofloxacin (41.7%), piperacillin/tazobactam and gentamicin (16.6% each), and all were resistant to colistin. There is a high rate of drug resistance and further studies to identify the source of the infection are needed to build up a profile of Elizabethkingia spp. to inform public health policy in this context.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Chryseobacterium, Male, Time Factors, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Intensive Care Units, Flavobacteriaceae Infections, Humans, Female, Flavobacteriaceae, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Chryseobacterium, Male, Time Factors, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Middle Aged, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Intensive Care Units, Flavobacteriaceae Infections, Humans, Female, Flavobacteriaceae, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
