Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The diagnostic value of the maximum value of Young's modulus of shear-wave elastography and ACR TI-RADS for thyroid nodules].

Authors: X, Xu; X L, He; L L, Guo;

[The diagnostic value of the maximum value of Young's modulus of shear-wave elastography and ACR TI-RADS for thyroid nodules].

Abstract

Objective:The aim of this study is to assess the application value of maximum Young's modulus of shear wave elastography in combination with Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System set by the American College of Radiology in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Method:A retrospective analysis of 113 thyroid nodules with ultrasonographic imaging data was carried out. All nodules were subjected to SWE and conventional ultrasonography, and Emax was recorded and classified according to the 2017 ACR TI-RADS. With pathology as the gold standard, the ROC curve was drawn and the best diagnostic cut-off was selected for comparing their diagnostic performance. Result:Of the 113 thyroid nodules, 51 were benign and 62 were malignant. Best cut-off point for diagnosing malignant by SWE was Emax>40 kPa. And at that point, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the average value of it were 74.2%, 76.5% and 75.2 %. Best cut-off point for diagnosing malignant by ACR TI-RADS was>TR4. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the average value of it were 80.6%, 78.4% and 79.6%. The sensitivity of the combination of the two examinations was significantly higher than that of simple application of each of them, while there was no significant difference in the specificity and accuracy between them. Conclusion:The SWE and ACR TI-RADS classification systems have important clinical value in identifying the benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The combination of the two methods can improve the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Elastic Modulus, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Humans, Thyroid Nodule, Sensitivity and Specificity, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!