
Objective:The aim of this study is to assess the application value of maximum Young's modulus of shear wave elastography in combination with Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System set by the American College of Radiology in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Method:A retrospective analysis of 113 thyroid nodules with ultrasonographic imaging data was carried out. All nodules were subjected to SWE and conventional ultrasonography, and Emax was recorded and classified according to the 2017 ACR TI-RADS. With pathology as the gold standard, the ROC curve was drawn and the best diagnostic cut-off was selected for comparing their diagnostic performance. Result:Of the 113 thyroid nodules, 51 were benign and 62 were malignant. Best cut-off point for diagnosing malignant by SWE was Emax>40 kPa. And at that point, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the average value of it were 74.2%, 76.5% and 75.2 %. Best cut-off point for diagnosing malignant by ACR TI-RADS was>TR4. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the average value of it were 80.6%, 78.4% and 79.6%. The sensitivity of the combination of the two examinations was significantly higher than that of simple application of each of them, while there was no significant difference in the specificity and accuracy between them. Conclusion:The SWE and ACR TI-RADS classification systems have important clinical value in identifying the benign and malignant thyroid nodules. The combination of the two methods can improve the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the diagnosis.
Elastic Modulus, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Humans, Thyroid Nodule, Sensitivity and Specificity, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
Elastic Modulus, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Humans, Thyroid Nodule, Sensitivity and Specificity, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
