Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Evidence of Selection Bias and Non-Response Bias in Patient Satisfaction Surveys.

Authors: Jocelyn, Compton; Natalie, Glass; Timothy, Fowler;

Evidence of Selection Bias and Non-Response Bias in Patient Satisfaction Surveys.

Abstract

Patient satisfaction surveys are increasingly utilized to measure the patient experience and as a tool to assess the quality of care delivered by medical providers. Press Ganey (PG) is the largest provider of tools for patient satisfaction measurement and analysis. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient satisfaction surveys were subject to selection and/ or nonresponse bias.Patients seen in an outpatient academic orthopedic clinic were included in this retrospective cohort study. Demographic data included age, race, gender, marital status, primary payer, and native language. All surveys were administered by PG Associates per internal protocols adhering to exclusion criteria within the institutional contract with PG Associates.3.5% of outpatient encounters generated PG survey data, which were generated by 9.1% of all patients evaluated. The population of patients who were administered as well as patients who responded to the patient satisfaction survey represented a unique population with regards to age, race, gender, marital status, insurance status, and native language.Demographically, patients who were administered and patients who responded to PG surveys differed from the overall population of patients seen in an outpatient orthopedic setting, evidencing both selection and non-response bias. Because of these differences, and considering the small number of survey returned, caution should be exercised when interpreting and applying these data.Level of Evidence: III.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Evidence-Based Medicine, Middle Aged, United States, Patient Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Outpatients, Humans, Female, Orthopedic Procedures, Delivery of Health Care, Selection Bias, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
    38
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest.
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
38
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!