Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Halarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Hal
Article . 1987
Data sources: Hal
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Some aspects of experimental bovine brucellosis.

Authors: Fensterbank, R.;

Some aspects of experimental bovine brucellosis.

Abstract

In the course of eight successive Brucella abortus experiments, 394 cows were followed by clinical, serological and bacteriological examinations. Cultures were made from vaginal swabs and colostrum at delivery and from 10 pools of lymph nodes or organs sampled at slaughter, about 6 weeks after calving. From these cows, 346 had been experimentally challenged with 1.5 X 10(7) B abortus strain 544 via the conjunctiva, 3 congenitally infected and 45 bought from known naturally infected herds. Males were more numerous (64%) in aborted foetuses and less numerous (34%) in premature live calves than females, the sex ratio being normal in calves born at term. Recovery of Brucella infection occurred between calving and slaughter in 13/230 cows (5.7%). It appeared that localization, spread and level of infection in different lymph nodes and organs, duration and outcome of pregnancy, and agglutination titers were strongly correlated. Comparisons between experimentally and naturally infected cows evidenced the fact that both types of infection were very similar. Confidence for field application of experimental results was thus reinforced.

Keywords

Male, [SDV.IMM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Immunology, [SDV.BA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Animal biology, Brucella abortus, [SDV.GEN.GA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics/Animal genetics, [SDV.BC.IC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular Biology/Cell Behavior [q-bio.CB], [SDV.BBM.BM] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Biochemistry, Molecular Biology/Molecular biology, Brucellosis, Bovine, [SDV.SPEE] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Santé publique et épidémiologie, Pregnancy, Animals, Cattle, Female, [SDV.NEU] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Neurons and Cognition [q-bio.NC], Sex Ratio, [SDV.BC] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cellular Biology, [SDV.MP] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Microbiology and Parasitology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    10
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
10
Average
Top 10%
Average
Green