Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Polydioxanone suture in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors: D A, Gillatt; A P, Corfield; R E, May; D C, Bartolo; D J, Leaper;

Polydioxanone suture in the gastrointestinal tract.

Abstract

A randomized prospective trial was undertaken of polydioxanone suture (PDS) versus conventional suture material in 98 patients undergoing anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract. Nine patients died within 6 months of surgery, one of these being related to an anastomotic leak. All other patients were followed up for between one and three and a half years. In 57 colonic anastomoses, 30 were randomized to a single layer of 2/0 (BPC) interrupted PDS and 27 to a single of 2/0 (BPC) interrupted silk. Follow up sigmoidoscopy and barium enemas were used to confirm the clinical suspicion of 6 benign anastomotic strictures, 5 of which occurred in the PDS group. At this stage, the colonic arm of the trial was discontinued because the 19% stricture rate with PDS was deemed unacceptable. In a second limb of the study, patients were randomized to two layers of 2/0 (BPC) continuous PDS or 2/0 (BPC) continuous chromic catgut. There were no significant differences in 32 gastric or small bowel anastomoses and in particular, no anastomotic strictures were apparent. The reasons for the high rate of stricture formation when using PDS for large bowel anastomoses are unclear. However, it would seem to be a suitable alternative to chromic catgut when confined to the stomach and small intestine.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Clinical Trials as Topic, Sutures, Polyesters, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Polydioxanone, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!