Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Chemosensitivity testing for 5-FU and 5-FU derivatives using subrenal capsule assay].

Authors: H, Anai; Y, Maehara; H, Kusumoto; H, Masuda; K, Sugimachi;

[Chemosensitivity testing for 5-FU and 5-FU derivatives using subrenal capsule assay].

Abstract

An evaluation was made, using in vivo subrenal capsule (SRC) assay, of the chemosensitivity of 12 human neoplastic tissues including 7 gastric cancers, 2 colo-rectal cancers, 2 lung cancers and 1 breast cancer, exposed to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and the 5-FU derivatives: tegafur (FT), UFT and hexylcarbamoyl-5-FU (HCFU). The relative variation of tumor size (delta TS/TS0) was calculated as follows: delta TS/TS0 = (TS6-TS0)/TS0 X 100 (%), where TS6 was the tumor size on day 6 and TS0 that on day 0, and more than a 10% decrease of delta TS/TS0 in the treated group was considered as positive for chemosensitivity. Delta TS/TS0 was decreased to -10.9 +/- 11.3% (mean +/- standard deviation) for 5-FU, -13.0 +/- 16.4% for FT, -19.8 +/- 18.2% for UFT and -18.8 +/- 15.1% for HCFU, and the inhibition of tumor growth following exposure to 5-FU correlated well with that following exposure to 5-FU derivatives (5-FU vs. FT, r = 0.659; 5-FU vs. UFT, r = 0.864; 5-FU vs. HCFU, r = 0.729). However, the sensitivity of each tumor varied; for example, the chemosensitivity was positive for 5-FU derivatives, but negative for 5-FU, in some tissues. The SRC assay appears to be useful for selecting sensitive drugs from 5-FU and 5-FU derivatives for individual cancer patients.

Keywords

Colony-Forming Units Assay, Lung Neoplasms, Stomach Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Fluorouracil, Uracil, Tumor Stem Cell Assay, Tegafur

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!