
The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of fecal blood testing are too poor to allow its general use as a screening test for colorectal cancers. Even the predictable qualitative improvement of these tests will be of no avail with regard to non-tumoral sources of bleeding or the non-hemorrhagic tumoral sources of bleeding or the non-hemorrhagic tumours which are frequent in the early stages of colorectal cancer. It is therefore essential to define high-risk groups, to pay particular attention even to minor symptoms, and to perform the necessary endoscopic or radiological diagnostic tests.
Risk, Rectal Neoplasms, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Occult Blood, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Mass Screening, Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Errors
Risk, Rectal Neoplasms, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Occult Blood, Colonic Neoplasms, Humans, Mass Screening, Colonoscopy, Diagnostic Errors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
