Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Pitfall of Laboratory Testing -Immunological Test -].

Authors: Masaki, Abe;

[Pitfall of Laboratory Testing -Immunological Test -].

Abstract

Immunological tests based on antigen-antibody reactions are widely used to detect and quantify tumor markers, hormones, infections, and other targets. The detection sensitivity and specificity of these tests have recently improved markedly as a result of technical advances in antibody preparation and optical meas- urement. Despite these technical innovations however, it remains impossible to completely prevent non- specific reactions. In this paper, we describe the causes of such non-specific reactions as obstacles to im- munological testing, mainly in automated testing; special reference is given to some cases of interference by cross-reactions, heterophile antibodies, and autoantibodies that we encountered while measuring carcinoem- bryonic antigens (CEAs). Since not only non-specific reactions but also exogenous factors, such as sample processing, can cause abnormal data, noteworthy points in actual test settings are also described. To cope with the abnormal data, it is necessary to raise risk awareness among technicians who perform immunological tests, and establish an information-sharing system that allows queries from physicians to be quickly relayed to staff in the actual test setting. [Review].

Keywords

Humans, Immunoglobulins, Clinical Laboratory Services, Immunologic Tests, Autoantibodies, Carcinoembryonic Antigen

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!