Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The Future Topics of Discussion on JSCC Recommended Methods].

Authors: Shuukoh, Yamadate; Tomohiro, Nakayama;

[The Future Topics of Discussion on JSCC Recommended Methods].

Abstract

In the JSCC, recommended methods for eight items of enzymes and 9 items of non-enzyme (one item for Na, K, and Cl) have been presented since the recommended methods of activity measurements of AST, ALT, CK, and LD were prepared in 1989. These recommended methods were prepared by placing priority on the actual situation of the measurement methods of those days in Japan, and there are some differences with IFCC recommended methods or primary reference procedures. Recently, from the viewpoint of global standardization, measured values that can be shared with data overseas are required even on clinical exami- nation, and overseas inspection facilities are sometimes used to avoid differences in measurement methods in international clinical trials. With this situation, when the recommended methods of JSCC and IFCC are compared, there are the following differences: - PALP for AST and ALT: not added in JSCC method/ added in IFCC method. - Buffer solution (pH) for LD: EAE (pH 8.8) in JSCC method/ NMG (pH 9.4) in IFCC method. Buffer solution for ALP: EAE in JSCC method/ AMP in IFCC method. Free glycerol for TG: not included on JSCC method/ included in ID-GC/MS method of NIST and CDC. It is necessary to consider from various aspects whether or not these differences affect the implementation of global standardization. In consideration, it is necessary to add the point of how the method should be linked directly to the international traceability of CRMLN (Cholesterol Reference Method Laboratory Net- work) and JCTLM (Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine) to the domestic surveillance and to judge it. [Review].

Keywords

Chemistry, Clinical, Societies, Medical

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!