Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Diversity of the osteoblastic phenotype.

Authors: G A, Rodan; J K, Heath; K, Yoon; M, Noda; S B, Rodan;

Diversity of the osteoblastic phenotype.

Abstract

Studies of bone cells in culture have raised two salient questions: are the findings representative of the in vivo situation and can the conflicting data from different cell models be reconciled? Review of the literature indicates that all osteoblastic cells, defined by their origin or by their ability to produce mineralized matrix, have a few common properties: production of type I collagen; increased alkaline phosphatase activity; and parathyroid hormone-stimulated adenylate cyclase. Other features, such as osteocalcin and prostaglandin E production and the response to prostaglandin E, are selectively expressed by certain cell types. Pilot studies on mRNA levels of 'bone proteins' in developing calvaria suggest that such differences may reflect stages in osteoblastic differentiation. Immortalization of calvaria-derived cells using a SV40 large T antigen vector, which may freeze the cells in their particular state of differentiation (as proposed for leukaemia cells), yields phenotypes consistent with that hypothesis. Immortal cell lines may thus help to characterize osteoblastic differentiation. The diversity of osteoblast responses in culture to hormones and growth factors could be due to these phenotype differences but could also represent a subspecialization of differentiated cells. In addition, in the organism regulatory agents act in concert on a heterogeneous interactive cell population. Nonetheless cell cultures can be useful in screening for and predicting in vivo responses, as was shown by the 1,25-(OH)2D3 stimulation of osteocalcin, and for studying the molecular mechanisms of regulatory effects. Cell lines are also convenient for the production of specific proteins and cDNA libraries, and for the expression of specific genes.

Keywords

Osteoblasts, Animals, Humans, Bone and Bones, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    28
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
28
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!