Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Perforating keratoplasty in pseudophakia].

Authors: M, Küchle; K W, Ruprecht; G K, Lang; A, Händel; G O, Naumann;

[Perforating keratoplasty in pseudophakia].

Abstract

Between July 1980 and March 1987 the authors performed pseudophakic penetrating keratoplasty in 56 eyes with bullous keratopathy following implantation of an intraocular lens. The postoperative results in 50 eyes (47 patients) are reported in this retrospective study. Average duration of follow-up after keratoplasty was 8.1 months. The intraocular lenses were either iris-supported (31), anterior chamber lenses (12), or posterior chamber lenses (7). The interval between implantation of the lens and performance of the keratoplasty ranged from three to 451 months (average 69.9 months). It varied considerably, depending on the type of lens used. Vision after penetrating keratoplasty improved in 44 of the 50 eyes and was unchanged in three. In ten eyes, improvement in vision was limited by persistent cystoid maculopathy (CMP). Postoperative complications occurred in five eyes and traumatic wound dehiscence in two. However, none of the transplants showed any signs of rejection during the follow-up period. The prognosis for penetrating keratoplasty following intraocular lens implantation is generally good; impaired vision is due to extracorneal factors, in particular CMP.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Lenses, Intraocular, Male, Visual Acuity, Middle Aged, Corneal Diseases, Corneal Transplantation, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Female, Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!