Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer].

Authors: Hiroshige, Nakamura; Tomohiro, Haruki; Ken, Miwa; Yuji, Taniguchi;

[Robot-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery for Lung Cancer].

Abstract

In addition to conventional video-assisted thoracic surgery(VATS)as minimallyinvasive surgeryfor lung cancer, medical insurance system of robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(RATS)byusing da Vinci Surgical System®(DVSS)is just adapted from this spring. Although VATS is widelydiffused in clinical practice, it is recommended as grade C1(considerable)in the latest lung cancer medical guideline. On the other hand, it has been noticed that RATS is attractive and expected to cover the disadvantages of conventional VATS. In the comparison of both VATS and RATS lobectomyfor lung cancer, theyhave been reported to be comparable in safetyand efficacy, but RATS is superior at the viewpoint of good operabilityand faster learning curve. However, high costs and the longer operative time in RATS are of a concern. Experience of RATS is still in the initial phase, however from now on RATS is graduallyinfiltrating and expected to demonstrate the improvement of perioperative outcome. Especially, manyinstitutes have just began to introduce robotic surgeryin general thoracic field after the adaption of medical insurance. So, safetyand sure spread of RATS is an urgent and important issue in our field. Of course, while coexisting with VATS, it is important to verifythe efficacyof RATS.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lung Neoplasms, Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted, Operative Time, Humans, Pneumonectomy, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!