
Data sourcesThe Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences (LILACS), LIVIVO, PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Open Gray and ProQuest database.Study selectionObservational studies conducted in adults aged over 18 where oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) had clinical diagnoses histologically confirmed were included.Data extraction and synthesisStudy selection and data abstraction were undertaken by two reviewers independently. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist of prevalence data was used to assess risk of bias. The prevalence of OMPDs expressed as a percentage was the main outcome. Random effects meta-analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted.ResultsTwenty two studies were included, seven from South America or the Caribbean, five from Asia, five from Europe and two each from North America and the Middle East. Three studies were considered to have a low risk of bias, twelve a moderate risk and seven a high risk of bias. The overall pooled prevalence of OPMD in this study was 4.47% (95% CI; 2.43 - 7.08). OPMDs were more common in males 59.99% (95% CI; 41.27 - 77.30%). Prevalence was highest in Asian populations 10.54% (95% CI; 4.60 - 18.55%).ConclusionsThe overall prevalence of OPMD worldwide was 4.47%, and males were more frequently affected by these disorders. The prevalence of OPMD differs between populations; therefore, further population-based studies may contribute to the better understanding of these differences.
name=General Dentistry, Meta-Analysis as Topic, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3500/3500, Prevalence, 610, Humans, Mouth Neoplasms, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Global Health
name=General Dentistry, Meta-Analysis as Topic, /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/3500/3500, Prevalence, 610, Humans, Mouth Neoplasms, Evidence-Based Dentistry, Global Health
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
