Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Comparison of the biodistribution of gadolinium-153 DTPA and technetium-99m DTPA in rats.

Authors: F S, Prato; G, Wisenberg; T P, Marshall; P, Uksik; P, Zabel;

Comparison of the biodistribution of gadolinium-153 DTPA and technetium-99m DTPA in rats.

Abstract

Twenty-three mature Sprague-Dawley male and female rats were simultaneously injected with trace quantities of [153Gd]DTPA and [99mTc]DTPA and 0.5 mmol/kg of nonradioactive gadolinium DTPA. Rats were killed at 1 min, 5 min, 10 min, 15 min, and 30 min after the intracardiac bolus injection. The heart, lungs, liver, brain, kidney, and blood were excised and counted in a well-counter to determine the amount of the injected material in each organ and blood. In order for the percent of total injected activity to be determined, a technique was developed which allowed discrimination of the 140 keV gamma-ray of 99mTc from sum peaks of 153Gd when the latter is counted in a well-counter with 4 pi geometry. Although the distribution of the two DTPA compounds was qualitatively similar, statistical analysis indicated that the amount of 99mTc deposited in the lungs was higher than 153Gd (p = 0.03), the amount of 99mTc deposited in the kidneys was lower than 153Gd (p = 0.0004) and the amount of 99mTc in the blood was higher than 153Gd (p = 0.0022). This may be due to the greater binding of [99mTc]DTPA or its minor impurities to plasma proteins.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Gadolinium DTPA, Male, Radioisotopes, Technetium, Gadolinium, Rats, Inbred Strains, Pentetic Acid, Rats, Organometallic Compounds, Animals, Technetium Tc 99m Pentetate, Female, Tissue Distribution

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    52
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
52
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!