[Trained eye vs. gold standard].
Copyright policy [Trained eye vs. gold standard].
To determine the degree of correlation between the clinical diagnosis prior to the minor surgery process and its concordance with the results of histopathology report, as well as to determine the surgical data of little clinical importance compared to that which is really necessary and cost-effective.A descriptive, observational, retrospective and transversal study was conducted of the Minor Surgery Activities of a clinic in the Ciudad Real Health Centre I.A total of 124 surgical specimens were sent for clinical diagnostic comparison, of which, the main clinical diagnoses were: intradermal melanocytic nevi (34.67%), seborrheic keratosis (11.30%), and epidermoid or sebaceous cysts (10.48%). A correlation of 68% was obtained. The protocols of the work centre have been followed to carry out this study in relation to the confidentiality of the data.These results were analysed and compared with other similar works performed in the field of minor surgery in Primary Care, being able to affirm that there is a good correlation between the initial clinical diagnosis and the histopathology results.
Male, Primary Health Care, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Clinical Decision-Making, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures, Skin Diseases, Diagnosis, Differential, Cross-Sectional Studies, Spain, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence, Minor Surgical Procedures, Diagnostic Errors, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Retrospective Studies
Male, Primary Health Care, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Clinical Decision-Making, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures, Skin Diseases, Diagnosis, Differential, Cross-Sectional Studies, Spain, Humans, Female, Clinical Competence, Minor Surgical Procedures, Diagnostic Errors, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Retrospective Studies
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).2 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!