Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Thoracoscopic Surgery].

Authors: Hiroyuki, Oizumi;

[Thoracoscopic Surgery].

Abstract

Thoracoscopic devices have become essential in general thoracic surgery. In the past 30 years, many reports about thoracoscopic surgery have expanded the indications to include malignant neoplasms. Various optional procedures including uniportal, non-intubated, robotic, and needlescopic techniques have been developed and more than 70% of lung cancer operations are currently performed using thoracoscopy in Japan. Although there are many choices for minimally invasive surgery, the long-term outcome of these options remains unclear. In addition, training systems for younger surgeons have not provided exposure to novel optional methods, as there are few high-volume centers in Japan.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Lung Neoplasms, Japan, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Thoracoscopy, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!