
The purpose of this research was to determine which job features create motivation and career satisfaction to retain personnel in the medical laboratory profession. Four research questions based on Wlodkowski's theory of motivation guided the study: Is there a difference in perceived career satisfaction among medical laboratory scientists who: a) feel included by practitioners in other healthcare professions, b) have choices on the job that are personally relevant, c) feel more challenged, and d) feel more competent in their daily work? In order to answer these questions, a survey composed of 33 questions was developed to capture the opinions of medical laboratory professionals who worked in the United States and had at least 1 year of experience. The survey was deployed online and posted on social media sites. Results, based on responses from 333 participants, showed that medical laboratory personnel are more satisfied with their career when they feel included with other healthcare professionals, make choices that are personally relevant, and feel challenged in their work. If current professionals are more satisfied in their work, they might remain in the workforce, and new professionals might be attracted to join the profession, helping to alleviate the shortage of medical laboratory scientists.
Adult, Male, Motivation, Career Choice, Interprofessional Relations, Middle Aged, Job Satisfaction, United States, Professional Competence, Medical Laboratory Personnel, Medical Laboratory Science, Humans, Female, Aged
Adult, Male, Motivation, Career Choice, Interprofessional Relations, Middle Aged, Job Satisfaction, United States, Professional Competence, Medical Laboratory Personnel, Medical Laboratory Science, Humans, Female, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
