Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Entrapment and non-entrapment syndromes at the elbow].

Authors: T, Godel; M, Pham;

[Entrapment and non-entrapment syndromes at the elbow].

Abstract

Entrapment syndromes of peripheral nerves at the elbow are common and are often diagnostically challenging disorders. Difficulties consist in lesion localization and recognition of complex spatial lesion patterns as well as in differentiation of focal and multifocal disorders.Medical history taking, neurological examination and neurophysiological tests represent the gold standard in the diagnosis of peripheral nerve lesions at the elbow, but have known methodical limitations.Additional diagnostic imaging tools recently developed for high-resolution visualization of extended peripheral nerve segments include 3 T magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) and neurosonography.MRN and neurosonography can directly visualize and thus precisely localize focal and nonfocal peripheral nerve lesions of various origins with high spatial resolution at the anatomical level of nerve fascicles.MRN can cover peripheral nerve structures at the elbow, evaluate spatial nerve lesion patterns and partly disclose underlying causes.Imaging of peripheral nerves is a valuable addition in the diagnostic work-up of entrapment syndromes at the elbow and provides important assistance in the differentiation of nonfocal differential diagnoses, especially in cases that cannot be clarified using standard diagnostic methods. The evaluation of spatial nerve lesion pattern may give additional information on the origin of the underlying disease, which is essential for further treatment.

Keywords

Nerve Compression Syndromes, Elbow, Humans, Peripheral Nerves, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!