Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Bluetongue and related orbivirus diagnosis in the United States.

Authors: J E, Pearson; E A, Carbrey; G A, Gustafson;

Bluetongue and related orbivirus diagnosis in the United States.

Abstract

The serologic test for bluetongue (BT) that was used in the US from 1968 to 1980 to qualify animals for export was the modified direct complement-fixation (MDCF) test. The MDCF test was replaced by the immunodiffusion (ID) test in 1980. In January 1984, there were 70 laboratories approved by the USDA to conduct BT ID export testing. Both tests are used at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) for the serologic diagnosis of suspected cases of BT and/or epizootic hemorrhagic disease (EHD). Serologic surveys were conducted on bovine samples collected from 18 northeastern states in the winters of 1977/1978, 1979/1980, 1982/1983 and 1983/1984. The percents of positive animals were 0.3, 0.3, 5.4 and 0.9. In 1977/1978 samples were collected from all states; 18.5% were positive. The primary technique used for the isolation of BT virus (BTV) at the NVSL is intravenous inoculation of embryonating chicken eggs with subpassage into Vero-M cell line cultures. Baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell line cultures are used for isolation of EHD virus (EHDV). Each virus is identified by staining with specific fluorescent antibody conjugate.

Keywords

Immunodiffusion, Sheep, Complement Fixation Tests, Cattle Diseases, Antibodies, Viral, Reoviridae, Bluetongue, United States, Reoviridae Infections, Animals, Cattle, Bluetongue virus

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!