
pmid: 29668216
pmc: PMC7596764
Oral anticancer medications (OAMs) are frequently used to treat patients with cancer. Unlike intravenous chemotherapy, OAMs are covered by prescription drug plans. We examined barriers to initiation of OAMs in 116 patients with prostate or kidney cancer (149 unique prescriptions). We found that the median time from initial prescription to prior authorization was 3 days and the median time from initial prescription to patient receipt of drug was 12 days. Seventy-three percent of all prescriptions required 2 or more phone calls by clinic staff and 40% required 5 or more calls. Of 107 prescriptions with data available, 54% utilized financial assistance; these required significantly more phone calls (P = .0001) and led to a longer median time to drug obtainment (P = .003) compared with those that did not require financial assistance. In those prescriptions with both initial and final co-pay information available, the initial out-of-pocket mean and median co-pays were $1226.03 and $329.73, respectively, but these dropped to $124.57 and $25.00 after utilization of co-pay assistance programs, excluding those with a $0 final co-pay. These early observations suggest that a more efficient process for initiation of OAMs is needed.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Medical Assistance, Time Factors, Administration, Oral, Prostatic Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Agents, Middle Aged, Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services, Prior Authorization, Health Services Accessibility, Kidney Neoplasms, Socioeconomic Factors, Deductibles and Coinsurance, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Medical Assistance, Time Factors, Administration, Oral, Prostatic Neoplasms, Antineoplastic Agents, Middle Aged, Insurance, Pharmaceutical Services, Prior Authorization, Health Services Accessibility, Kidney Neoplasms, Socioeconomic Factors, Deductibles and Coinsurance, Humans, Female, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
