Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Risk factors for low anterior resection syndrome].

Authors: G J, Wu; W W, Jia; Q, An; T, Yu; X L, Cao; G, Xiao;

[Risk factors for low anterior resection syndrome].

Abstract

Objective: While low anterior resection avoided a permanent stoma, it might also cause bowel dysfunction which can significantly impact patients' quality of life. The objective of this study was to identify the incidence and risk factors for the development of bowel dysfunction following rectal surgery. Methods: Patients undergoing anterior resection for rectal neoplasm between January 2010 and December 2015 were identified from a rectal cancer database at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Beijing Hospital. All patients were asked to fill in a low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) questionnaire. Clinical factors were compared between patients with major LARS and those with minor or no LARS using conditional logistic regression. Results: There was 254 patients enrolled in the study. One hundred and eleven (44.1%) had major LARS symptoms. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (OR=2.814, 95%CI: 1.097-5.561, P<0.001), low tumor location (OR=3.568, 95%CI: 1.159-6.546, P<0.001) and anastomotic leakage (OR=6.574, 95%CI: 1.689-15.367, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for development of major LARS symptoms. Conclusions: For patients with high risk of low anterior resection syndrome, the potential for long-term poor functional results should be discussed with patients and form a part of the decision-making in individual treatment plans. Sphincter-preserving surgery should be performed in highly selected patients to avoid major bowel dysfunction.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Postoperative Complications, Rectal Neoplasms, Risk Factors, Quality of Life, Humans, Syndrome

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!