Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy.

Authors: A H, DeCherney; M P, Diamond;

Laparoscopic salpingostomy for ectopic pregnancy.

Abstract

Seventy-nine ampullary tubal ectopic pregnancies were managed using laparoscopic linear salpingostomy. An incision was made on the antimesenteric side of the fallopian tube, over the point of maximum bulge, with unipolar electrocautery, the argon laser, or CO2 laser. Bleeding was controlled by micropinpoint cautery. After completion of the procedure, the abdomen was lavaged with Ringer's lactate, and 200 mL of Hyscon was placed in the peritoneal cavity. Patients were also treated with doxycycline 100 mg twice daily. There were two major complications, both involving continued bleeding recognized within one hour of the original procedure. One resulted from faulty equipment, and the other was associated with removal of an ectopic pregnancy greater than 3 cm in greatest diameter. All patients were discharged within 24 hours of the procedure. There were no long-term complications. Of 69 patients actively trying to conceive, 43 (62%) conceived. Seven (16%) of the conceptions were repeat ectopic pregnancies, divided between the contralateral and ipsilateral tube. Ten of forty-three (23%) aborted. The viable pregnancy rate of 38% is comparable to that with other techniques. It would appear from our observations that a skilled laparoscopist can remove a small tubal pregnancy in this manner with minimal complications.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Postoperative Complications, Pregnancy, Electrocoagulation, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Laser Therapy, Salpingostomy, Fallopian Tubes, Pregnancy, Ectopic

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    108
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
108
Average
Top 1%
Top 1%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!