Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Differentiation of radiation-induced fibrosis from recurrent pulmonary neoplasm by CT.

Authors: P, Bourgouin; G, Cousineau; P, Lemire; P, Delvecchio; G, Hébert;

Differentiation of radiation-induced fibrosis from recurrent pulmonary neoplasm by CT.

Abstract

We describe and compare the computed tomographic (CT) manifestations of radiation fibrosis and recurrent neoplasm and consider the potential application of CT in the follow-up of patients after radiotherapy for bronchogenic carcinoma. Thirty-one patients were evaluated in this retrospective study. The CT findings in 20 patients with radiation fibrosis were compared with those in 11 patients with recurrent tumor. In 19 of the 20 patients with radiation fibrosis, CT allowed demonstration of consolidation, with a straight lateral margin and containing ectatic air-containing bronchi. In 9 of the 11 patients with recurrent tumor, CT showed a soft tissue mass with a convex lateral border and without air-containing bronchi. Twenty of the 31 patients had a suspected recurrence on plain chest radiographs. CT permitted accurate differentiation between radiation fibrosis and recurrent tumor in all patients, with the exception of two who had large pleural effusions. Because of its great specificity, CT appears useful in complementing chest radiographs in the follow-up of patients after radiotherapy.

Keywords

Male, Lung Neoplasms, Radiotherapy, Pulmonary Fibrosis, Middle Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic, Humans, Female, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Radiation Injuries, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!