Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Corneal densitometry : Value for keratoconus diagnostics].

Authors: M, Alnawaiseh; N, Eter;

[Corneal densitometry : Value for keratoconus diagnostics].

Abstract

Corneal densitometry, based on the Scheimpflug principle, is a useful noninvasive tool for quantitative evaluation of the optical quality of the cornea. It enables us to evaluate corneal transparency in the different corneal layers and different annuli. In this article, we discuss the basis of application of corneal densitometry measurements and summarize findings in patients with keratoconus.This article is based on a selective literature review and analysis of own data.Patients with keratoconus have significant higher corneal densitometry values compared to healthy controls. Densitometry values also correlate with the extent of the disease. In the first months after corneal cross-linking (CXL), haze formation occurs and leads to a decrease in corneal transparency, thus densitometry peaks. Long-term analysis of densitometric data have shown that corneal transparency then starts to decrease after 3 to 6 months, and improves further with time. At 24 to 36 months after CXL, corneal transparency levels might achieve physiological values.Corneal transparency is reduced in patients with keratoconus. In the first months after CXL, haze formation and a reduction in corneal transparency can be observed, which subsequently improve with time.

Keywords

Photosensitizing Agents, Ultraviolet Rays, Corneal Stroma, Riboflavin, Corneal Topography, Keratoconus, Cornea, Cross-Linking Reagents, Photochemotherapy, Humans, Collagen, Densitometry, Follow-Up Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!