
In normal and Class I malocclusions, ramus and mandibular angles are found to correlate most strongly with cranial base dimensions rather than angles, whereas in Class II malocclusions these angles tend to relate more closely to the cranial base angles.
Cephalometry, Skull, Mandibular Condyle, Malocclusion, Angle Class I, Mandible, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Face, Humans, Nasal Bone, Sella Turcica, Child, Malocclusion
Cephalometry, Skull, Mandibular Condyle, Malocclusion, Angle Class I, Mandible, Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Face, Humans, Nasal Bone, Sella Turcica, Child, Malocclusion
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
