Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Contraception Update: Oral Contraception.

Authors: Elizabeth J, Brown; Prium, Deshmukh; Karen, Antell;

Contraception Update: Oral Contraception.

Abstract

The oral contraceptive pill (OCP) is the most commonly used form of reversible contraception. The two types of OCPs are combination oral contraceptives (COCs), which contain estrogen and progesterone, and progestin-only pills (POPs). Both have failure rates of approximately 7.2% to 9% with typical use, and are safe for most patients. Because estrogen-containing contraceptives can increase the risk of venous thromboembolism, patients with conditions associated with a risk of cardiovascular events should not use COCs. Blood pressure level should be assessed before initiation of oral contraceptives. Noncontraceptive benefits of oral contraceptives include reduced risk of ovarian and endometrial cancers, more favorable bleeding patterns, and improvement in menstruation-related symptoms such as acne, migraine headaches, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. OCPs can be initiated any time the physician can be reasonably certain that the patient is not pregnant. Extended cycle regimens may be preferred by some patients. After assessing need, physicians should present all methods that can be used safely using a tiered effectiveness approach. High-quality contraceptive counseling includes working collaboratively with patients to find the most effective and acceptable method for them and helping to identify factors that may assist in or hinder their ability to use the method correctly over time.

Keywords

Family Planning Services, Humans, Drug Interactions, Female, Family Practice, Contraceptives, Oral

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!