Until now six ophthalmic agents have undergone the German early benefit assessment according to § 35a Social Security Code (SGB) V in a total of eleven indications. Only one agent (ocriplasmin) was recognized by the Federal Joint Committee as having an added benefit based on submitted study data for a subpopulation (indication of a considerable added benefit, limited for 5 years) and another agent, idebenone, received an added benefit due to its orphan drug designation (proof of a not quantifiable added benefit, limited for 2 years). All remaining agents (aflibercept, bromfenac, nepafenac and tafluprost/timolol) were not recognized as having an added benefit. The analysis showed that there was a lack of suitable evidence. Some reasons for the inappropriateness of the conducted trials for the usage in the early benefit assessment are the comparative therapy, the patient population included or the dosage regimens. For two agents (bromfenac and nepafenac) the pharmaceutical company did not even submit a value dossier. The examples from ophthalmology illustrate the methodological and procedural shortcomings of the assessment process and that results of an early benefit assessment should be interpreted with caution.