Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[The Comparison and Evaluation of Partial Nail Avulsion and Total Nail Avulsion with Plate Replacement with Traditional Total Nail Avulsion].

Authors: Si-Liang, Xue; Rong, Mei; Dan, Wu; Xi, Lü;

[The Comparison and Evaluation of Partial Nail Avulsion and Total Nail Avulsion with Plate Replacement with Traditional Total Nail Avulsion].

Abstract

To determine the different effects of partial nail avulsion and total nail avulsion with plate replacement with traditional total nail avulsion.Patients were divided into three groups randomly ( n=20): total nail avulsion group (control group), partial nail avulsion group, and total nail avulsion with plate replacement group (nail replacement group). The rating of pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) score], the wound healing time, the nail growth time , and the score of satisfaction were analyzed.The baseline data of three groups had no significant difference. From 8 h, VAS score of partial nail avulsion group and nail plate replacement group was different with that in control group ( Pnail replacement group>partial nail avulsion group ( P<0.05) . Nail growth time was the longest in control group, the shortest in partial nail avulsion group ( P<0.05, vs. control group), and median in nail replacement group. The score of satisfaction in control group was lower than that in partial avulsion group and nail replacement group ( P<0.05) , of the later two there was no statistic difference.By decreasing the defect of nail plate and the injury of nail bed, and by smoothing the pain, partial nail avulsion benefits the wound-healing. Nail plate should be replace to get further benefits.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Wound Healing, Nails, Humans, Pain Measurement

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!