Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Effect of mechanical self-cleaning of tongue coating on malodor in halitosis patients originating from tongue coating].

Authors: J, Wang; L, He;

[Effect of mechanical self-cleaning of tongue coating on malodor in halitosis patients originating from tongue coating].

Abstract

To evaluate the malodor level and to explore the effect of mechanical self-cleaning of tongue coating in patients with halitosis originating from tongue coating.Ten patients with halitosis originating from tongue coating were enrolled and divided into two groups randomly. The patients in test group received instruction of mechanical cleaning of tongue coating while no such instruction was given to control group. Organoleptic test (OLT) score, volatile sulfide compounds (VSC) value, area of tongue coating (Ta), thickness of tongue coating (Tt) and periodontal condition were recorded at baseline and were repeated at the end of 1 week, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 8 weeks later. The clinical outcomes were compared at different time points between the groups. Also, changes within the group were analyzed.As time went by, tongue coating area and thickness tended to decrease in test group while the changes showed no statistically difference (P>0.05). The organoleptic score in test group decreased significantly (P0.05), though they showed a tendency to decrease and fewer changes in control group were found. Compared with the baseline, average probing depth and bleeding index (P0.05). Plaque index showed no difference at different time points in both the groups (P>0.05).Mechanical self-cleaning of tongue coating did not influence plaque index while it had tendency to reduce tongue coating area and thickness. Malodor could be released after self-cleaning of tongue coating to a certain extent, indicating necessity and importance of intervention role by dentists.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Sulfur Compounds, Tongue, Dental Plaque Index, Humans, Halitosis, Sulfides, Periodontal Diseases

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!