
Evaluation of retrospective results of treatment of patients with kidney cancer, who have undergone a laparoscopic or a retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy.We have conducted a retrospective analysis of 185 patients with kidney tumour, who have undergone a laparoscopic or a retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy during 2010-2015. Amongst the participants there were 116 men (62.7%) and 69 women (37.3%) aged 29-86 (average age of 58.1 years). 150 patients (81.1%) have performed radical nephrectomy by transperitoneal access, while 30 patients (16.2%) experienced identical process through retroperitoneal access. 5 cases (2.7%) hybrid technique was utilized. 97 patients performed nephrectomy on the right side, 88 patients on the left side. 178 patients (96.2%) had a single kidney tumours, while 7 (3.8%) had multiple tumours ranging between 2-8. 15 patients, who experienced a laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, had a thrombus in kidney vein (level 1 under Mayo classification). 1 patient had a thrombus in vena cava (level 2).Only one of the patients suffered a fatal outcome. 12 patients (6.5%) had a conversion. The duration of operation ranged between 50-215 minutes (average of 104.3 minutes), time of insufflation ranged between 36-205 minutes (average of 96.2 minutes). Average intraoperative blood loss constituted 147.8 ml. Patients spent 2-18 days (average 4.1 days) in the hospital after the surgery.There is an obvious advantage to utilizing a laparoscopic or a retroperitoneoscopic intervention in order to treat kidney cancer. The process constitutes minimal invasiveness, low death rates, minimal intraoperative blood loss and fast rehabilitation of the patients. 72% of patients who have who have experienced surgical intervention, such as radical nephrectomy, spent only 3-4 days in the hospital.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Middle Aged, Nephrectomy, Kidney Neoplasms, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Humans, Female, Laparoscopy, Middle Aged, Nephrectomy, Kidney Neoplasms, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
