
Modern intraoperative techniques of visualization are increasingly being applied in general and visceral surgery. The combination of diverse techniques provides the possibility of multidimensional intraoperative visualization of specific anatomical structures. Thus, it is possible to differentiate between normal tissue and tumor tissue and therefore exactly define tumor margins. The aim of intraoperative visualization of tissue that is to be resected and tissue that should be spared is to lead to a rational balance between oncological and functional results. Moreover, these techniques help to analyze the physiology and integrity of tissues. Using these methods surgeons are able to analyze tissue perfusion and oxygenation. However, to date it is not clear to what extent these imaging techniques are relevant in the clinical routine. The present manuscript reviews the relevant modern visualization techniques focusing on intraoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging as well as augmented reality, fluorescence imaging and optoacoustic imaging.
Diagnostic Imaging, Optical Imaging, Virtual Reality, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Equipment Design, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multimodal Imaging, Photoacoustic Techniques, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Computer Systems, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Neoplasms, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Diagnostic Imaging, Optical Imaging, Virtual Reality, Angiography, Digital Subtraction, Equipment Design, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multimodal Imaging, Photoacoustic Techniques, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Computer Systems, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Neoplasms, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
