Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[HLA compatibility and susceptibility to habitual abortion. Results of histocompatibility testing of couples with frequent miscarriages].

Authors: A, Karl; G, Metzner; H J, Seewald; M, Karl; U, Born; G, Tilch;

[HLA compatibility and susceptibility to habitual abortion. Results of histocompatibility testing of couples with frequent miscarriages].

Abstract

We have performed class I HLA antigen testing in 42 women with recurrent habitual abortions and in their husbands. The main criterion for inclusion in this group was a frequency of more than two abortions without the known reasons for abortion and without a living child. 29 couples with a least two healthy children and no abortion in the clinical history served as a control group. The data were evaluated in respect to the association of HLA and disease as well as to the level of histocompatibility within the couples. In our results we did not find any significant association between HLA-A, B, C phenotypes and the habitual abortion. On the other hand, we observed a significantly higher level of histocompatibility in the couples with habitual abortions in comparison to the control couples. The frequency of identity in one and more histocompatibility antigens was in the patient group significantly higher than in the control group and as it could be expected by chance, calculated on the basis of antigen distribution within the loci A, B, C in the population in the southern part of the GDR. In no case we have revealed lymphocytotoxic antibodies as a possible cause for miscarriage. Our results are in favour of the hypothesis that a higher level of histocompatibility could be an immunological explanation for the habitual abortions. In addition, this hypothesis was supported by the successful immunotherapy with leukocytes derived from the husband or nonrelative donors.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Abortion, Habitual, Histocompatibility Testing, Phenotype, Gene Frequency, HLA Antigens, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!