
Ultrasound (US) evaluation of diaphragm thickness and contractility is an effective tool in neurogenic diaphragm dysfunction. There are limited data about the value of this technique in patients with myopathy.We performed a retrospective chart review of cases with electromyography (EMG) -confirmed myopathy and real-time US evaluation of the diaphragm. Diaphragm thickness and thickening ratio (maximal inspiration/expiration) were measured. Demographic, imaging, pathology, and genetic data were reviewed, and the clinical diagnosis was recorded.There were 19 eligible cases, of which 14 (73.7%) had abnormal US findings. Mean diaphragm thickness was 0.12 cm (SD 0.10), and the mean thickening ratio was 1.29 (SD 0.35). In all cases with abnormal US evaluation, the thickening ratio was abnormal. There were no cases with abnormal thickness alone.US examination can detect diaphragm dysfunction in myopathy. It is important to measure both the baseline thickness and thickening ratio to maximize sensitivity. Muscle Nerve 55: 427-429, 2017.
sonography, Male, electromyography, ultrasound, Electromyography, Diaphragm, 2804 Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 1314 Physiology, 2737 Physiology (medical), Muscular Diseases, diaphragm, Humans, Female, neuromuscular, 2728 Clinical Neurology, myopathy, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
sonography, Male, electromyography, ultrasound, Electromyography, Diaphragm, 2804 Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 1314 Physiology, 2737 Physiology (medical), Muscular Diseases, diaphragm, Humans, Female, neuromuscular, 2728 Clinical Neurology, myopathy, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
