Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Immunodiagnostics of visceral toxocariasis.

Authors: H M, Khalil; M E, Azab; E H, Safar; M A, Bebars; H M, el-Hady; H M, Khattab;

Immunodiagnostics of visceral toxocariasis.

Abstract

Twenty five suspected cases of visceral toxocariasis and 25 apparently healthy controls, were tested in four serological tests, namely precipitin absorption test (PAT), counter immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Adult Toxocara worm antigen was used in PAT & CIEP as saline extract and as frozen sections (FS) in IFAT while the embryonated eggs (EE) were used as saline extract in ELISA and as a whole in IFAT. The percentages of positivity reported were 44% by PAT, 24% with CIEP, 52% with IFAT (EE), 48% with IFAT (FS), and 52% in the ELISA. In the apparently healthy control group, only one subject gave positive result with PAT, and ELISA at titres of 1/16 and 1/64 respectively. The EE antigen proved to be more sensitive than adult worm antigen, where it was used in IFAT & ELISA and gave the highest percentage of positivity and the highest titre (1/256 & 1/4096 respectively). It was noticed that the children below the age of 10 years, were statistically significant (P less than 0.05) by all tests except CIEP.

Keywords

Adult, Male, Adolescent, Antibodies, Helminth, Infant, Middle Aged, Antigens, Helminth, Child, Preschool, Larva Migrans, Visceral, Animals, Humans, Female, Serologic Tests, Child, Toxocara

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!