
pmid: 27682804
pmc: PMC5158119
Standard cultivation fails to grow most microorganisms, whereas in situ cultivation allows for the isolation of comparatively diverse and novel microorganisms. Information on similarities and differences in the physiological properties of isolates obtained from in situ cultivation and standard cultivation is limited. Therefore, we used the arctic sediment samples and compared two culture collections obtained using standard and novel cultivation techniques. Even though there was no temperature selection at the isolation step, isolates from each method showed different reactions to temperature. The results of the present study suggest that isolates from in situ cultivation are more competitive in their natural environment.
Microbiological Techniques, Arctic Regions, Short Communication, Temperature, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Biota, DNA, Ribosomal, diffusion chamber, Bacterial Typing Techniques, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, cold adaptation, Environmental Microbiology, Cluster Analysis, arctic microbes, growth characteristics, Phylogeny
Microbiological Techniques, Arctic Regions, Short Communication, Temperature, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Biota, DNA, Ribosomal, diffusion chamber, Bacterial Typing Techniques, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, cold adaptation, Environmental Microbiology, Cluster Analysis, arctic microbes, growth characteristics, Phylogeny
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
