Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Endoscopic sphincterotomy].

Authors: A, Henkinbrant; W, Khalek;

[Endoscopic sphincterotomy].

Abstract

The last 105 endoscopic sphincterotomies performed between 1983 and 1987 are evaluated and compared with the recent data of the literature. The sphincterotomy has been successful in 98 cases (93%). The indications were: 95 cases of common bile duct stones and 10 inflammatory stenoses of the duodenal papilla. The stones have been removed in all cases of sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis (100% of the successful sphincterotomies, 93% of all attempts). The morbidity rate was 5%. There has been no need for emergency intervention. Mortality was zero. In order to obtain high success rates with endoscopic sphincterotomies and removal of stones with minimal morbidity and mortality, the procedure should be performed by an experienced operator who avoids precutting in case of difficult insertion and who makes calibrated incisions related to the volume of the stones (not larger than 2 cm). Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a safe method of treatment for choledocholithiasis and papillary stenosis. It carries a lower morbidity and mortality than surgery.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Ampulla of Vater, Common Bile Duct Diseases, Gallstones, Middle Aged, Humans, Female, Sphincter of Oddi, Duodenoscopy, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!