
In human palaeontology, samples are generally collections of objects gathered according to morphological criteria and their statistical analysis usually calls for caution because of the relatively small number of objects. Testing normality for such samples is a critical problem. The procedure suggested by Filliben, however, is particularly suitable for small to moderate sample sizes. Moreover, it provides a graphical presentation of the data that permits to locate each object within the distribution range. We briefly review the principle of the method and give a computer program to carry out the necessary computations and plot. Finally, we illustrate the method by studying the distribution of the maximum length and the maximum breadth for a sample of skulls of the Upper Palaeolithic.
Male, Skull, Humans, Paleontology, Female, Mathematics, Software
Male, Skull, Humans, Paleontology, Female, Mathematics, Software
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
