Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Polymicrobial sepsis among intensive care nursery infants.

Authors: R G, Faix; S M, Kovarik;

Polymicrobial sepsis among intensive care nursery infants.

Abstract

To determine the incidence, characteristics, and course of polymicrobial sepsis among infants in intensive care nurseries, we reviewed all such episodes in our neonatal unit from September 1971 through June 1986. We identified 15 episodes (3.9% of all cases of culture-proven sepsis during the survey period) in which blood or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture yielded multiple organisms felt to represent true pathogens. Mortality associated with late-onset polymicrobial sepsis (7 of 10; 70%) was significantly higher (P less than .001) than in late-onset monomicrobial sepsis (86 of 370; 23%). Six patients were 37 weeks' gestation or greater at birth, and five were younger than 4 days of age when the polymicrobial culture was obtained. Group D streptococci were recovered in eight cases (53%). Gastrointestinal foci appeared to be common among infants with late-onset polymicrobial infection (5 of 10), while prolonged rupture of membranes was frequently associated with early-onset infection (4 of 5). Though recovery of multiple organisms from blood or CSF may not always be significant, one should not immediately assume contamination. A report of more than one organism growing from a normally sterile body fluid in an intensive care nursery infant should be considered significant, and therapy should be adjusted to provide appropriate antimicrobial agents for all reported organisms if the infant has not substantially improved in the interval since the culture was actually obtained.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Time Factors, Bacteria, Infant, Newborn, Bacterial Infections, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Leukocyte Count, Risk Factors, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Sepsis, Humans, Female, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    19
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
19
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!