Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Cystocele and perineal ultrasound : Comparison of reliability and patient satisfaction].

Authors: R, Blum; G, Blum; G, Link; I, Meinhold-Heerlein; L, Najjari;

[Cystocele and perineal ultrasound : Comparison of reliability and patient satisfaction].

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common medical finding. The use of perineal ultrasound for diagnosis of cystoceles is gaining in importance.The purpose of this work was to test whether perineal ultrasound can be used to diagnose a cystocele before surgery and for follow-up examination. Furthermore, patient satisfaction during speculum examination and perineal ultrasound was compared.33 women with cystocele were examined before and after anterior colporrhaphy. Symptoms and satisfaction were documented with questionnaires.Ultrasound measurements of both examiners were correlated before and after colporrhaphy. Also, the degree of cystocele and ultrasound were correlated during Valsalva after surgery. There was no clear relation between typical symptoms of the cystocele and ultrasound measurements. The patient's comfort is higher during ultrasound than during speculum examination (r = 0.45; p = 0.04. t = 4,418; p < 0.01).The results of the perineal ultrasound are reproducible before and after colporrhaphy. Patients prefer ultrasound to the speculum examination. A sonographic scale of the cystocele would extend the use of perineal ultrasound.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Adolescent, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Perineum, Sensitivity and Specificity, Young Adult, Patient Satisfaction, Germany, Humans, Female, Patient Comfort, Cystocele, Aged, Ultrasonography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!