Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Pathogenicity of the open processus vaginalis peritonei].

Authors: T, Golka; A M, Holschneider; R, Fischer; M H, Blessing;

[Pathogenicity of the open processus vaginalis peritonei].

Abstract

In 100 postmortem examination on adults whose age at the time of death had been between 21 and 85 years, an only partially obliterated processus vaginalis or Nuck's diverticulum was seen in 29 cases. Whereas in women the peritoneal bulges often represented only pointers to a patent diverticulum, never being longer than 1 cm, in every fourth man there was a unilateral or bilateral processus longer than 2 cm and wider than 0.5 cm. However, none of the p.m. examined adults had been suffering from inguinal hernia during lifetime. The results point to the possible conclusion that persistence of a processus vaginalis without development of hernia is by no means unusual--in fact, it is even normal. Since the alleged pathogenicity of the patent processus supplies the basis for applying herniography and contralateral exploration, we must doubt whether this procedure is justified. In addition, it must be borne in mind that both x-ray diagnosis and surgery of processus vaginalis can be associated with risks, such as excessive radioexposure of the gonads and atrophy of the testes as a result of lesions of the spermatic cord system. Even if these risks are kept at a minimum, the following reasons can be advanced against the x-ray method and hence also routine bilateral herniotomy: 1. the processus vaginalis is already obliterated; herniography and surgery would be unnecessary; 2. a patent processus vaginalis can be obliterated on its own even after x-ray demonstration; 3. a patent processus is not a hernial sac and will not necessarily result in subsequent inguinal hernia.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Inguinal Canal, Hernia, Inguinal, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Peritoneum, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!