Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[An in vitro drug screening assay, scintillation assay, and its clinical application].

Authors: N, Tanigawa; T, Shimomatsuya; K, Takahashi; H, Inoue; H, Morimoto; Y, Masuda; R, Muraoka; +2 Authors

[An in vitro drug screening assay, scintillation assay, and its clinical application].

Abstract

We have developed an in vitro drug screening test by scintillation assay with which we can assess the chemosensitivity of solid human tumors during the 5 days following tumor resection. We are able to evaluate 62% (271/439) of the human tumors' chemosensitivity results. Seventy-seven of these cases were examined for in vitro-in vivo correlations. In 14 of 33 in vitro sensitivity cases (42%) we found clinical responses. And, in 41 of 44 in vitro resistance cases (95%) we found progressive disease. These in vitro-in vivo correlations with the scintillation assay were similar to those in other reports with different types of chemosensitivity assay. The true-positive accuracy of these tests averaged 50%, while the true-negative accuracy averaged 90%. We think that tumor cell heterogeneity is one of the main reasons for low true positive accuracy in the drug screening assays. In some studies we implanted human tumors into nude mice. The resulting xenografts demonstrated that fresh human tumors are composed of heterogeneous subpopulations of cells with varying chemosensitivities and varying DNA indexes. This heterogeneic nature of human tumor cells means that a single biopsy specimen may not comprehensively define the chemosensitivity of a patient disease.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Humans, Scintillation Counting, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, In Vitro Techniques, Tritium, Thymidine

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!