Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.

Authors: J H, Check; J S, Chase; K, Nowroozi; C H, Wu; R, Chern;

Clinical evaluation of the Pipelle endometrial suction curette for timed endometrial biopsies.

Abstract

A clinical study was performed to determine the efficacy of the Pipelle in obtaining endometrial samples to be analyzed for luteal function. Patients' tolerance of this instrument and their willingness to undergo subsequent biopsies were also ascertained. An endometrial sample was obtainable from 1,278 women with the Pipelle, whereas 52 required the Novak curette and in 60 the sample could not be obtained with either instrument. Thirteen percent of the patients biopsied with the Pipelle stated that they would not allow a second such procedure to be performed. One percent of the samples were deemed inadequate for hormonal reading. The Pipelle seemed to be a safe, minimally traumatic method of sampling the endometrium for hormonal evaluation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Endometrium, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Biopsy, Needle, Humans, Female, Equipment Design, Consumer Behavior, Luteal Phase

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!