Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

[Renal colic and renal calculus].

Authors: Y, Siegel; D, Korczak; J, Asherov; A, Lindner;

[Renal colic and renal calculus].

Abstract

A positive diagnosis of urinary stone was made in 183 of 407 patients (44.9%) with renal colic seen in the emergency room. 182 (44.7%) had normal intravenous pyelograms, 26 (6.4%) had evidence of dilatation of the urinary system, possibly due to the passage of a stone, and 16 (3.9%) had other pathological urinary conditions, such as double collecting system or cysts. Stones were located in the upper urinary tract in 28.4%, in the midureter in 21.9%, and in the lower ureter in 49.7%. There was a statistically significant correlation between recurrent episodes of left-sided renal colic, erythrocytes in the urine and the presence of a stone in the urinary tract. No ethnic differences were found, nor was there a difference in the rates of stones found in those who were hospitalized and in those who were not.

Keywords

Hospitalization, Kidney Calculi, Colic, Recurrence, Humans, Kidney Diseases, Urography, Israel, Emergency Service, Hospital

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!